Mr Martin has been a consistently outspoken critic of the government’s changing lockdown rules.
When Wetherspoon published its interim results earlier this month he accused the government and SAGE of being “unscientific in their approach – ignoring evidence, which contradicts their ‘narrative'”.
“Rather than embracing, debating and investigating anomalies and counterintuitive information, as real scientists do, they have, instead tried to discredit dissenters,” he said.
“These tactics can work in an election campaign, but risk disaster in the day-to-day management of problems.”
He blasted “examples of entirely unscientific initiatives” such as the introduction of a curfew, the requirement for a “substantial meal” with a drink and the wearing of face masks to visit the bathroom.
“This approach has contributed to the UK having one of the biggest hits to the economy of any country, and the worst health outcomes of any large country,” Mr Martin said.